Navigating the Legal Landscape of Private Placement Offering in Minnesota: Key Considerations and Potential Pitfalls

Navigation the Legal Landscape of Private Placement Offerings in Minnesota:  Key Considerations and Potential Pitfalls

Private placement offerings represent a vital avenue for businesses in Minnesota to raise capital without the regulatory complexities of public offerings.  However, navigating the legal intricacies of these transactions is crucial to ensure compliance and avoid potential pitfalls.

Understanding Private Placements:

Private placements in Minnesota are governed by both federal and state securities laws. Unlike public offerings, private placements are not required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), provided they comply with certain exemptions. The most commonly utilized federal exemption is Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933. 

Federal Compliance:

1. Regulation D Exemptions: Businesses must understand the specific requirements of Rule 504, 505, and 506 under Regulation D. These rules set forth the conditions regarding the type and number of investors, disclosure requirements, and investment limits. The SEC offers regular investor alerts and bulletins regarding Private Placements Under Regulation D.
2. Accredited Investors: A key element of private placements is the reliance on accredited investors. These are individuals or entities that meet certain financial criteria, reducing the need for extensive disclosures as promulgated in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D. Both individuals and entities can qualify as accredited investors.
   
   a.  How can individuals qualify as accredited?
   
   • Financial Criteria:
     1. Individuals must have a net worth over $1 million, excluding primary residence (individually or with spouse or partner); or
     2. Individuals must have income over $200,000 (individually) or $300,000 (with spouse or partner) in each of the prior two years, and reasonably expects the same for the current year.
   • Professional Criteria:
     1. Investment professionals in good standing holding the general securities representative license (Series 7), the investment adviser representative license (Series 65), or the private securities offerings representative license (Series 82);
     2. Directors, executive officers, or general partners (GP) of the company selling the securities (or of a GP of that company);
     3. Any “family client” of a “family office” that qualifies as an accredited investor; or
        For investments in a private fund, “knowledgeable employees” of the fund.

b.  How can entities qualify as accredited?

• • Investments–Entities owning investments in excess of $5 million.
  • Assets– The following entities with assets in excess of $5 million: corporations, partnerships, LLCs, trusts, 501(c)(3) organizations, employee benefit plans, “family office” and any “family client” of that office.
  • Owners as Accredited– Entities where all equity owners are accredited investors.
  • Investment Advisers– Investment advisers (SEC- or state-registered or exempt reporting advisers) and SEC-registered broker-dealers.
  • Financial Entities– A bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, registered investment company, business development company, or small business investment company or rural business investment company.

Minnesota State Compliance:

1. Minnesota Securities Law: In addition to federal law, private placements in Minnesota are subject to state securities laws. Issuers must not only comply with the Minnesota Uniform Securities Act, Minn. Stat. §80A, et seq., but must also pay close attention to the Securities Act of 1933, as many of the Minnesota Uniform Securities Act’s definitions and exemptions, among other things, are taken directly from and interplay with the Securities Act of 1933.
2. Notice Filing: Issuers are generally required to file a notice with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, along with a filing fee, when relying on a federal exemption.

Key Considerations for Execution:

1. Drafting the Offering Memorandum: This document should provide detailed information about the investment, including business plans, financial statements, and risk factors. Transparency is key to avoiding legal issues.
2. Investor Verification: Ensuring that investors qualify as accredited or otherwise suitable is critical. This involves verifying their financial status and investment experience.
3. Legal Due Diligence: Conducting thorough due diligence helps identify potential legal issues with the business or offering, reducing the risk of future disputes or regulatory scrutiny.

Potential Pitfalls:

1. Inadequate Disclosure of Information:

• Pitfall: Failing to provide sufficient information to potential investors can lead to claims of misrepresentation or fraud. This includes not disclosing material risks, financial status, or business plans accurately.
• Avoidance Strategy: Ensure that offering documents are comprehensive and transparent. Engage legal and financial experts to review and confirm that all material information is accurately disclosed.

2. Non-compliance with Accredited Investor Rules:

• Pitfall: Improperly vetting investors can result in non-compliance with the SEC’s requirements for accredited investors, leading to regulatory penalties.
• Avoidance Strategy: Implement stringent procedures to verify the status of each investor. Maintain detailed records of the verification process.

3. Overlooking State-Specific Requirements:

• Pitfall: Neglecting Minnesota’s specific filing requirements or exemptions can invalidate the offering, leading to legal and financial repercussions.
• Avoidance Strategy: Consult with a Minnesota securities attorney to ensure compliance with state-specific regulations, including necessary filings and fees.

4. Failure to Adhere to Limitations under Regulation D:

• Pitfall: Exceeding the investor or capital limits set under the chosen Regulation D rule can result in the loss of the exemption.
• Avoidance Strategy: Carefully monitor the offering to ensure it stays within the bounds of the chosen exemption under Regulation D.

5. Ignoring Post-Offering Compliance Obligations:

• Pitfall: Many issuers wrongly assume that their responsibilities end once the capital is raised. This oversight can lead to ongoing compliance failures.
• Avoidance Strategy: Develop a compliance plan for post-offering requirements, including any necessary ongoing disclosures and filings.

6. Inadequate Legal Counsel:

• Pitfall: Attempting to navigate the complexities of private placements without adequate legal guidance can lead to errors and oversights.
• Avoidance Strategy: Engage a securities attorney with specific experience in private placements and Minnesota state law to guide the process from start to finish.

7. Improper Use of Proceeds:

• Pitfall: Using the raised funds in a manner not specified in the offering documents can lead to investor lawsuits and regulatory action.
• Avoidance Strategy: Clearly outline the intended use of proceeds in the offering documents and ensure that the funds are used accordingly.

8. Lack of Ongoing Communication with Investors:

• Pitfall: Failing to maintain open lines of communication with investors post-investment can lead to mistrust and potential legal disputes.
• Avoidance Strategy: Establish regular updates and communication channels with investors to keep them informed of the business’s progress and any material changes.

In conclusion, while private placement offerings provide a viable avenue for raising capital in Minnesota, they are fraught with potential legal and regulatory pitfalls. By being aware of these common issues and engaging in proactive strategies to avoid them, businesses can successfully navigate the complexities of private placements. Remember, the guidance of a knowledgeable securities attorney is invaluable in this process.

Mr. Kibort practices in business litigation and financial-services litigation, including defending financial advisors, financial planners and investment advisors, financial planning firms, investment firms, fund managers, funds, hedge funds, and brokerage firms, including in SEC and FINRA investigations and lawsuits, FINRA arbitrations and mediations.  This blog entry is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship; it is merely an example to provide some legal education.  It is simply intended to provide general information.  Each case is fact specific and requires its own unique solution.  It is strongly recommended that you seek the advice of a qualified attorney to help you with any questions you have.  We can handle your matters in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, California, and Washington D.C.

Parker Daniels Kibort is a full-service litigation law firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  We have a proven record of success at the highest levels for our clients.  We are organized to attack cases with efficient, responsive representation.

Our Founding Principles:

• RESPONSIVENESS – We live with an attitude of accessibility. We are available and ready to respond to your questions or concerns 24/7, all week, every week.
• RESULTS – We win with an aggressive unrelenting approach to trial, and track record is, put simply, unmatched.
• RELATIONSHIPS – We work closely with our clients and routinely develop long-lasting relationships harkening back to the days of lawyer as counselor, confidant, and close advisor.

We live our banner motto – WISE COUNSEL, WINNING RESULTS.

If you have questions about Private Placement Offerings in Minnesota or other business litigation or financial-services litigation, Parker Daniels Kibort can help. Give us a call at 612.355.4100.